About this blog...

I have read a lot of conflicting material on the subject of the Sabbath and the Lord's Day and because of this I have decided to start my own historical research. I am going back and reading as many historical references as I can find in their original context. This blog will be a summery of what I find.

The Basic Guidelines that I Will Be Following:
- I will not take any quotes out of context.
- I will try to categorize by place and date.
- I will try my best to only post clearly documented material. Where this is not possible, I will not post the material or else I will make it clear that the
material's authenticity is questionable.
- I will keep my personal assumptions to a minimum.

Points of Interest to Me:
- The early Christian church view of Saturday as the Sabbath and Sunday as the Lord's Day.
- The early Celtic church and Saturday Sabbath observance.
- The Roman Catholic Church's claim to have changed the Saturday Sabbath to Sunday.
- The Eastern Orthodox church and how it distinguished between "the Sabbath" (Saturday) and "the Lord's
day" (Sunday).
- The dynamics between modern Christians with different perspectives on this subject.

Saturday, September 3, 2011

Canon VIII.

Canon VIII.

That Hebrews ought not to be received unless they have been converted
in sincerity of heart.

Since certain, erring in the superstitions of the Hebrews, have thought
to mock at Christ our God, and feigning to be converted to the religion
of Christ do deny him, and in private and secretly keep the Sabbath and
observe other Jewish customs, we decree that such persons be not
received to communion, nor to prayers, nor into the Church; but let
them be openly Hebrews according to their religion, and let them not
bring their children to baptism, nor purchase or possess a slave. But
if any of them, out of a sincere heart and in faith, is converted and
makes profession with his whole heart, setting at naught their customs
and observances, and so that others may be convinced and converted,
such an one is to be received and baptized, and his children likewise;
and let them be taught to take care to hold aloof from the ordinances
of the Hebrews. But if they will not do this, let them in no wise be
received.

Notes.

Ancient Epitome of Canon VIII.

Hebrews must not be received unless they are manifestly converted with
sincerity of heart.

Hefele.

The Greek commentators Balsamon and Zonaras understood the words "nor
to baptize their children" to mean, "these seeming Christians may not
baptize their own children,'" because they only seem to be Christians.
But parents were never allowed to baptize their own children, and the
true sense of the words in question comes out clearly from the second
half of the canon.
__________________________________________________________________

1 comment:

  1. Cheyenne,

    It's not clear to me who issued these canons, the Roman Catholic Church or the Greek Orthodox. I'm guessing it was the Roman.

    In any case, these canons are a truly ironic combination of antinomianism (rejection of the Torah) on the one hand, and legalistic man-made decrees and burdensome lists of dos and don'ts, that make non-issues into matters of anathema, on the other. It's bizarre that these canons opposed "judaizing", as if to protect Christian liberty, yet heaped such piles of rules on the faithful in their method of opposing judaizing.

    I found these very eye-opening regarding present-day popular perceptions of Sabbath-keeping and kneeling in church.

    Blessings,
    Ed Tuggy

    ReplyDelete

Followers